|
 |
|
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
|
|
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 15
| Issue : 1 | Page : 42-50 |
| |
Prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome, phenotypes and their ovulation response to sequential letrozole dose escalation among infertile women at a tertiary care centre in Southern India
Abha Khurana1, MV Swamy2, Sujoy Mitra2, Sangisapu Srinivas2, N Nagaraja1
1 Assisted Reproductive Technology Centre, Command Hospital Southern Command, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| Date of Submission | 16-Sep-2021 |
| Date of Decision | 23-Feb-2022 |
| Date of Acceptance | 24-Feb-2022 |
| Date of Web Publication | 31-Mar-2022 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sangisapu Srinivas
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_141_21
 Abstract | | |
Background: Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) often have anovulatory infertility requiring ovulation induction with letrozole. Aims: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and phenotypic categorisation of infertile PCOS women and to assess ovulatory response and pregnancy rates of PCOS phenotypes with sequential letrozole dose escalation. Study Setting and Design: This was a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy-five infertile PCOS women were enrolled. One hundred fifty-six women received ovulation induction as per the protocol with sequential letrozole dose escalation in each subsequent cycle (2.5 mg, 5 mg and 7.5 mg). Responses were assessed by ovulation and/or pregnancy. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics were elaborated by means, medians, frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons and linear correlation between two continuous variables were done using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Eighty-seven (49.7%) women were Phenotype A; 11 (6.3%) were Phenotype B; 20 (11.4%) were Phenotype C and 57 (32.6%) were Phenotype D in our study. After excluding the lost to follow up participants in each induction cycle, 33.3% (2.5 mg dose); 62.8% (5 mg dose) and 78.9% (7.5 mg dose) women responded to letrozole. A significant increase in ovulation to escalating letrozole doses was noted (Phenotype A: 35.1% to 2.5 mg, 53.7% to 5 mg and 72.7% to 7.5 mg; Phenotype B: 30% to 2.5 mg and 80% to 5 mg; Phenotype C: 35.3% to 2.5 mg and 87.5% to 5 mg and Phenotype D: 30.8% to 2.5 mg, 65.6% to 5 mg and 87.5% to 7.5 mg). Fifty-six of 156 (35.9%) infertile PCOS women achieved pregnancy; increase in pregnancy rates with escalated doses of letrozole was noted. Conclusion: All PCOS phenotypes show a similar response to escalating doses of letrozole. The role of phenotypic sub-categorisation for variable response to letrozole as an ovulation-inducing agent is uncertain.
Keywords: Letrozole, infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes, polycystic ovary syndrome
How to cite this article:
Khurana A, Swamy M V, Mitra S, Srinivas S, Nagaraja N. Prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome, phenotypes and their ovulation response to sequential letrozole dose escalation among infertile women at a tertiary care centre in Southern India. J Hum Reprod Sci 2022;15:42-50 |
How to cite this URL:
Khurana A, Swamy M V, Mitra S, Srinivas S, Nagaraja N. Prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome, phenotypes and their ovulation response to sequential letrozole dose escalation among infertile women at a tertiary care centre in Southern India. J Hum Reprod Sci [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 24];15:42-50. Available from: https://www.jhrsonline.org/text.asp?2022/15/1/42/342092 |
| Introduction | |  |
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), one of the most common endocrinopathies in women of reproductive age, is a significant public health issue with reproductive, metabolic and physiologic features. The results of epidemiological studies of PCOS largely depend on how the study population and the PCOS phenotypes were defined. The worldwide prevalence of PCOS ranges from 4% to 21%, depending on the diagnostic criteria used.[1] European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) issued guidelines for the diagnosis of PCOS (also known as Rotterdam 2003 criteria).[2] PCOS is diagnosed if the patient demonstrates two of the following three criteria: (a) oligo or chronic anovulation, (b) clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism (HA) and (c) polycystic ovaries. It is necessary to exclude other causes of androgen excess and anovulatory infertility before diagnosing a patient with PCOS.[2]
Women with PCOS often have anovulatory infertility and hence require ovulation induction. Several methods have been effective for ovulation induction and fertility treatment in women with PCOS. However, ovulation and pregnancy rates with aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole and anastrozole appear to be promising.[3] Lately, various studies and guidelines recommend the use of letrozole as first-line therapy for all women with PCOS.[4] Till date, no studies are available to assess the response to escalating doses of letrozole in different phenotypes among infertile PCOS women.
The present study was done to assess the prevalence of PCOS phenotypes among infertile PCOS women and their individual phenotypic response to ovulation induction with sequential letrozole dose escalation at a tertiary care hospital in Southern India.
The primary objective of the study was clinical, biochemical, hormonal and ultrasonographic evaluation of infertile women for PCOS diagnosis and phenotypic categorisation and to further assess the response of individual PCOS phenotype to ovulation induction with sequential letrozole dose escalation. The secondary objective of the study was clinical pregnancy.
| Materials and Methods | | |
This prospective cohort study was carried out in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, a tertiary care government hospital in Southern India catering to women from different ethnic groups and cultural diversity prevailing over the Indian subcontinent. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee vide letter number 1911/12/IEC/PG Trg dated 02 Nov 2018, and carried out from November 2018 to April 2020. Ethical principles of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2013) were adhered to while conducting the study. The sample size was calculated for estimating a 95% confidence interval with a relative error of margin of 5%. The maximum sample size worked out to be 196 for a prevalence of 15% of PCOS in population, hence planned to study 200 patients. However, in view of the unexpected COVID-19 pandemic, only 175 participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria could be enrolled in the current study. Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants.
A total of 175 infertile women having PCOS (Phenotypes A, B, C and D) with patent Fallopian tube More Detailss and normo-zoospermic male partners were included in the study. Infertile PCOS women with severe endometriosis, diminished ovarian reserve (AMH <1 ng/ml, FSH >12 IU/L), endocrine disorders, age >40 years and congenital or acquired uterine anomaly and those with abnormal male factor (oligo-astheno-terato-zoospermia) were excluded from the study.
All participants were diagnosed with PCOS using Rotterdam criteria.[2] Menstrual cycle history was recorded to determine the extent of menstrual cycle disturbance and/or duration of infertility. Oligomenorrhea or chronic anovulation was diagnosed in patients having less than eight menstrual cycles per year, or frequent bleeding at an interval of less than 21 days, or bleeding at an interval of more than 35 days. A physical examination was done to assess height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and acne. Hirsutism, defined as an abnormal amount of sexual hair in a male pattern, was assessed on nine regions of the body using the modified Ferriman–Gallwey score of ≥8.[5] Clinical HA was diagnosed in patients who had acne or hirsutism or androgenic alopecia (male pattern baldness). Fasting blood tests were performed to assess the levels of blood glucose, free testosterone, prolactin, thyroid hormones, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) to evaluate for causes of anovulation other than PCOS such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia and androgen-secreting tumours (only infertile women with normal values of DHEAS and 17-OHP were included in the study). Biochemical HA was diagnosed if serum androgen level was elevated (total testosterone >600 ng/l or free testosterone >12 ng/l). Polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) was established by transvaginal ultrasound transducers with a frequency bandwidth of 8 MHz if more than 20 follicles of 2–9 mm in diameter were present in at least one ovary (without a cyst or follicle), and/or ovarian volume of >10 ml (Para 1.4.4 of international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of PCOS 2018). All study participants also underwent hysterosalpingogram to confirm tubal patency and semen analysis of spouse to exclude male factor infertility.
The study participants were classified as per the National Institute of Health (NIH) consensus panel (2012)[6] into PCOS phenotype classification: Phenotype A: HA (clinical or biochemical presence) + ovulatory dysfunction (OD) + PCOM; Phenotype B: HA + OD; Phenotype C: HA + PCOM and Phenotype D: OD + PCOM.
A basal scan on day 2/3 of the cycle was performed to rule out the presence of ovarian cyst and to determine the endometrial thickness (ET). Ovulation induction was started only when there was no dominant follicle of size >10 mm and ET <5 mm. If the above criteria were met, ovulation induction was done as per the ovulation induction protocol with letrozole. A sequential escalation of letrozole dose was done in each subsequent cycle if there was no response to a particular dose and ovulatory response was assessed. The starting dose was 2.5 mg/day, cycle days 3 to 7, following a spontaneous menses or progestin-induced bleed. If ovulation did not occur, the dose was increased to 5 mg/day in the next cycle, cycle days 3 to 7, with a maximal dose of 7.5 mg/day (American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACOG] 194, 2018) in the subsequent cycle. Transvaginal ultrasound examination was performed on day 10 of menses and followed up every other day according to the follicular size. The primary objective of effect on ovulation in different PCOS phenotypes was assessed with regular transvaginal ultrasonography. When the mean diameter of the leading follicle measured 18 mm, ovulation was triggered with injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 5000 Units intramuscularly. Timed intercourse was advised 24–36 h after hCG injection. Two days after giving hCG, the participants were assessed for signs of ovulation (disappearance of the pre-ovulatory follicle, fluid in the cul-de-sac and/or corpus luteum formation). Pregnancy outcomes were assessed based on a positive pregnancy test (chemical pregnancy) and clinical pregnancy was diagnosed when a gestational sac was detected on transvaginal ultrasound examination at 6-week period of gestation or amenorrhea. Response assessment was done using sonographic evidence of ovulation as the primary endpoint and positive pregnancy test as secondary endpoint respectively.
Of the 175 infertile PCOS women recruited for the study, 19 were lost to follow up. After PCOS phenotypic categorisation, 156 women were given the first cycle of ovulation induction as per the protocol, and the data were further analysed.
Statistical analysis
Data were coded and recorded in the MS Excel spreadsheet program. SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation, USA) was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics included documentation of means/standard deviations and medians/interquartile range for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Data were presented in a graphical manner wherever appropriate for data visualisation. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using independent sample 't'-test when comparing two groups. If data were found to be non-normally distributed, appropriate non-parametric tests in the form of the Wilcoxon test were used. Chi-square test was used for group comparisons of categorical data. In case the expected frequency in the contingency tables was found to be <5 for >25% of the cells, Fisher's exact test was used instead. Linear correlation between two continuous variables was explored using Pearson's correlation (if the data were normally distributed) and Spearman's correlation (for non-normally distributed data). Statistical significance was noted at P < 0.05.
| Results | | |
A total of 175 infertile PCOS women participants were enrolled for the study as per the inclusion criteria. Nineteen infertile PCOS women were lost to follow up before ovulation induction protocol could be initiated, as in [Figure 1]. The remaining 156 participants were given ovulation induction with letrozole starting at 2.5 mg once daily for 5 days, with sequential dose escalation by 2.5 mg (maximum dose 7.5 mg) in each subsequent cycle if there was no response as in [Figure 1].
Fifty-two (33.3%) of 156 women had an ovulatory response after the first cycle of letrozole 2.5 mg, while the remaining 104 (66.7%) did not respond. Amongst the 104 participants who did not respond to 2.5 mg, 18 were lost to follow up. Therefore, only the remaining 86 participants underwent a second cycle of ovulation induction with an escalated dose of letrozole 5 mg. Fifty-four (62.8%) of 86 participants responded to 5 mg and 32 (37.2%) participants did not respond. Amongst 32 participants who did not respond to 5 mg letrozole, 13 were lost to follow up, leaving only 19 participants who underwent third cycle ovulation induction with an escalated dose of letrozole 7.5 mg. Fifteen (78.9%) participants responded and the remaining 4 (21.1%) did not respond.
The study response to ovulation induction with letrozole was further assessed with clinical pregnancy as the secondary endpoint. Fifty-six (35.9%) of 156 infertile PCOS women who received at least one cycle of letrozole achieved clinical pregnancy, whereas 100 (64.1%) women could not achieve the secondary objective of this study.
Demographic variables, baseline characteristics and distribution of the study participants in terms of letrozole dose at response are depicted in [Table 1]. The summary of association between individual PCOS phenotype and various parameters in our study and their statistical significance is depicted in [Table 2]. | Table 1: Demographic variables, baseline characteristics and distribution of the study participants in terms of letrozole dose at response
Click here to view |
 | Table 2: Association between individual polycystic ovarian syndrome phenotype and various parameters in our study and their statistical significance (n=175)
Click here to view |
Eighty-seven (49.7%) of 175 participants were diagnosed as PCOS Phenotype A, 11 (6.3%) of 175 as Phenotype B, 20 (11.4%) of 175 as Phenotype C and 57 (32.6%) of 175 as Phenotype D in our study. There was no significant difference noted between the various PCOS phenotypic groups in terms of distribution of letrozole dose at response amongst the total study participants (χ2 = 8.622, P = 0.735).
After excluding the lost to follow up participants in each induction cycle, the proportion of infertile women responding to escalating letrozole doses in each phenotype were calculated.
Phenotype A: Twenty-seven of 77 (35.1%) participants had ovulation response to the first cycle of induction with 2.5 mg letrozole, 22 of 41 (53.7%) participants had ovulation response to the second cycle of induction with 5 mg letrozole and 8 of 11 (72.7%) participants had ovulation response to the third cycle of induction with 7.5 mg letrozole dose.
Phenotype B: Three of 10 (30%) participants had ovulation response to the first cycle of induction with 2.5 mg letrozole, 4 of 5 (80%) participants had ovulation response to the second cycle of induction with 5 mg letrozole, whereas no participant required the third cycle with 7.5 mg dose.
Phenotype C: Six of 17 (35.3%) participants had ovulation response to the first cycle of induction with 2.5 mg letrozole, 7 of 8 (87.5%) participants had ovulation response to the second cycle of induction with 5 mg letrozole, whereas no participant required the third cycle of 7.5 mg dose.
Phenotype D: Sixteen of 52 (30.8%) participants had ovulation response to the first cycle of induction with 2.5 mg letrozole, 21 of 32 (65.6%) participants had ovulation response to the second cycle of induction with 5 mg letrozole and 7 of 8 (87.5%) participants had ovulation response to the third cycle of induction with 7.5 mg letrozole dose.
There was a significant difference in ovulatory response noted with the individual phenotype on letrozole dose escalation, after excluding the lost to follow up participants. Histogram depicts the individual phenotypic response to escalating doses [Figure 2]. | Figure 2: Histogram depicting the individual phenotypic response to escalating doses. (The coloured bars represent proportion of polycystic ovarian syndrome women in phenotypes a-d, showing ovulatory response to assigned protocol dose in each successive cycle)
Click here to view |
About 16.9%, 24.4% and 36.4% of PCOS Phenotype A participants achieved clinical pregnancy with letrozole 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 7.5 mg dose, respectively. In Phenotype B, no participants achieved pregnancy with 2.5 mg dose, 20% achieved pregnancy with 5 mg dose and no participants were there for 7.5 mg dose. In Phenotype C, 17.6% of participants achieved pregnancy with 2.5 mg dose, 37.5% achieved pregnancy with 5 mg dose and no participants were there for 7.5 mg. In Phenotype D, 15.4%, 31.2% and 50% achieved pregnancy with letrozole 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 7.5 mg dose, respectively. It was noted that there was an increase in pregnancy rates with escalating doses of letrozole, as in [Figure 3]. The cumulative success rate of pregnancy was 44.8% (56 of 125) among infertile PCOS women who completed the study protocol of three cycles. The percentages of pregnancy with respect to ovulatory response at each escalating letrozole dose in different PCOS phenotypes are depicted in [Table 3]. | Table 3: Distribution of different polycystic ovarian syndrome phenotypes with ovulatory response and pregnancy with escalating letrozole doses after excluding the lost to follow up participants (n=125)
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: Histogram depicting Pregnancy rates of phenotypes to various doses. (The coloured bars represent the proportion of polycystic ovarian syndrome women in phenotypes a-d, showing ovulatory response to assigned protocol dose in each successive cycle)
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the ovulation induction response and pregnancy rates with letrozole induction within PCOS phenotypes.
Our study showed a significant increase in ovulation and increase in pregnancy rates with escalated doses of letrozole across all PCOS phenotypes.
PCOS is a common hormonal disorder in women of reproductive age. Several sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed in the past.[2] In our study, the recommendations of ESHRE/ASRM (Rotterdam 2003 criteria) were used for the diagnosis of PCOS,[2] and the participants were classified into various PCOS phenotypes based on the NIH consensus panel evidence-based guidelines (2012).[6]
PCOS is one of the main causes of infertility resulting from chronic anovulation. Several methods have been effective for ovulation induction. The ACOG and various international associations have now recommended the use of letrozole as first-line therapy for all women with PCOS.[3],[4]
The worldwide prevalence of PCOS ranges from 5% to 20% among different geographic regions when the ESHRE/ASRM 2003 criteria were applied, as shown in [Table 4].[1],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] Overall, it seems that the classic form of PCOS (i.e., Phenotypes A and B) constitutes approximately two-third of the total PCOS participants identified within the clinical setting.[18] PCOS phenotypes present differently in their clinical, metabolic and hormonal profile which can alter their response to ovulation-inducing agents like letrozole. It could be the interplay between genetic and environmental factors which affect the pathogenesis of PCOS.[19] Another possible explanation given is the intrauterine exposure to maternal androgens which might be responsible for a particular phenotype.[20] | Table 4: Prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome in different countries
Click here to view |
Across the phenotypic spectrum of PCOS, there was no significant difference in the distribution range of BMI (kg/m2) in our study (P = 0.097). However, Welt et al.[21] and Moran et al.[22] observed an increased BMI and increased prevalence of obesity in Phenotypes A and B.
Regarding the prevalence of individual phenotypes, overall published data indicate that more than half of PCOS participants identified within the clinical setting demonstrate Phenotype A, whereas the other three phenotypes (B, C and D) have almost equal prevalence. Sachdeva et al.[23] observed that Phenotype A was most common with 67.7% (111 patients), followed by Phenotype C with 17.7% (29 patients), Phenotype B with 11% (18 patients) and Phenotype D with 3.6% (6 patients). Comparative relative prevalence in our study shows Phenotype A with lower prevalence (49.7% vs. 67.7%), and higher prevalence of Phenotype D (32.6% vs. 3.6%) by Sachdeva, et al.[23] It was also noted that the prevalence of PCOS Phenotype C was also relatively less (11.4% vs. 17.7%). Zhang et al.[24] and several other studies, as shown in [Table 5],[1],[8],[10],[12],[14],[16],[25],[26] observed a relatively higher prevalence of Phenotype D in the general population, and not amongst infertile females. There is a paucity of literature with respect to PCOS phenotype prevalence amongst infertile patients. | Table 5: Distribution polycystic ovarian syndrome phenotypes in unselected population in various countries
Click here to view |
Only 20 of 175 participants were detected to have no OD. As they did not spontaneously conceive despite the natural occurrence of ovulation, we attempted ovulation induction with letrozole. Six women exposed to 2.5 mg of letrozole and 7 women exposed to 5 mg of letrozole responded. The failure to conceive despite spontaneous ovulation could be also due to other causes of infertility.
Results were further categorised into individual PCOS phenotypic responses to escalated doses of the ovulation-inducing agent. Overall, it was noted that 33.3% of all participants with 2.5 mg, 62.8% with 5 mg and 78.9% women with 7.5 mg of letrozole responded to ovulation induction.
It was further noted that within each PCOS phenotype class, there was an equally improved response to an escalating dose of letrozole. However, it cannot be conclusively said with statistical certainty in view of the dwindling number of participants at each subsequent cycle of induction reducing the sample size thereof. Loss to follow up was mainly due to intercity transfer of our clientele coupled with unforeseen COVID-19 pandemic situation.
The overall pregnancy rates for all PCOS participants without phenotypic categorisation in our study were higher in comparison to the study by Badawy et al.[27] and Bayar et al.[28] (35.9% vs. 15.1% vs. 9.1%, respectively). However, our results are quite similar in comparison to Indian studies by Roy et al.[29] and Kar et al.[30] (35.9% vs. 43.8% vs. 21.96%, respectively).
An important observation of our study is that PCOS phenotypic categories responded equally to the ovulation induction with similar doses of letrozole and an improved response was seen with subsequent dose escalation across all phenotypes. Hence, the clinical usefulness of phenotypic categorisation as far as ovulation induction is concerned is uncertain.
Limitations of the study
The study population is small in our study with progressive loss to follow up in subsequent visits. There was a drop in participant attendance due to the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic. The present data are of the mixed Indian population, so it does not take into account the ethnic differences.
| Conclusion | | |
PCOS is one of the most common endocrinopathies in women of reproductive age. Understanding the prevalence and distribution of PCOS phenotypes is essential in defining the epidemiology of PCOS in a population, considering that geographic factor and ethnic/racial variations can also shape their clinical presentation. All PCOS phenotypes respond in a similar fashion to escalating doses of letrozole with improvement in achieving ovulation and pregnancy rates as well. Hence, whether PCOS phenotypic categorisation has an advantage in terms of difference in response to letrozole as an ovulation-inducing agent is of questionable value according to our study. Larger and pooled data are needed to validate our study in view of the limitations of our study.[31],[32]
Data availability statement
The data set used in the current study is available with corresponding author and will share upon reasonable request.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Ma YM, Li R, Qiao J, Zhang XW, Wang SY, Zhang QF, et al. Characteristics of abnormal menstrual cycle and polycystic ovary syndrome in community and hospital populations. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123:2185-9.  |
| 2. | Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004;19:41-7. |
| 3. | Franik S, Eltrop SM, Kremer JA, Kiesel L, Farquhar C. Aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) for subfertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;5:CD010287. |
| 4. | ACOG Committee Opinion No. 738: Aromatase inhibitors in gynecologic practice. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e194. |
| 5. | Ferriman D, Gallwey JD. Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1961;21:1440-7. |
| 6. | |
| 7. | Boyle JA, Cunningham J, O'Dea K, Dunbar T, Norman RJ. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a sample of Indigenous women in Darwin, Australia. Med J Aust 2012;196:62-6. |
| 8. | March WA, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Phillips DI, Norman RJ, Davies MJ. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod 2010;25:544-51. |
| 9. | Gabrielli L, Aquino EM. Polycystic ovary syndrome in Salvador, Brazil: A prevalence study in primary healthcare. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012;10:96. |
| 10. | Li R, Zhang Q, Yang D, Li S, Lu S, Wu X, et al. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in women in China: A large community-based study. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2562-9. |
| 11. | Zhuang J, Liu Y, Xu L, Liu X, Zhou L, Tang L, et al. Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in female residents of Chengdu, China. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014;77:217-23. |
| 12. | Lauritsen MP, Bentzen JG, Pinborg A, Loft A, Forman JL, Thuesen LL, et al. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a normal population according to the Rotterdam criteria versus revised criteria including anti-Mullerian hormone. Hum Reprod 2014;29:791-801. |
| 13. | Kumarapeli V, Seneviratne Rde A, Wijeyaratne CN, Yapa RM, Dodampahala SH. A simple screening approach for assessing community prevalence and phenotype of polycystic ovary syndrome in a semi-urban population in Sri Lanka. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:321-8. |
| 14. | Tehrani FR, Simbar M, Tohidi M, Hosseinpanah F, Azizi F. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample of Iranian population: Iranian PCOS prevalence study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011;9:39. |
| 15. | Mehrabian F, Khani B, Kelishadi R, Ghanbari E. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in Iranian women based on different diagnostic criteria. Endokrynol Pol 2011;62:238-42. |
| 16. | Yildiz BO, Bozdag G, Yapici Z, Esinler I, Yarali H. Prevalence, phenotype and cardiometabolic risk of polycystic ovary syndrome under different diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3067-73. |
| 17. | Rashidi H, Ramezani Tehrani F, Bahri Khomami M, Tohidi M, Azizi F. To what extent does the use of the Rotterdam criteria affect the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome? A community-based study from the Southwest of Iran. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;174:100-5. |
| 18. | Wild RA, Carmina E, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dokras A, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular risk and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome: A consensus statement by the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (AE-PCOS) Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:2038-49. |
| 19. | Franks S, McCarthy MI, Hardy K. Development of polycystic ovary syndrome: Involvement of genetic and environmental factors. Int J Androl 2006;29:278-85. |
| 20. | Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Kouli C, Tsianateli T, Bergiele A. Therapeutic effects of metformin on insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism in polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 1998;138:269-74. |
| 21. | Welt CK, Gudmundsson JA, Arason G, Adams J, Palsdottir H, Gudlaugsdottir G, et al. Characterizing discrete subsets of polycystic ovary syndrome as defined by the Rotterdam criteria: The impact of weight on phenotype and metabolic features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:4842-8. |
| 22. | Moran L, Teede H. Metabolic features of the reproductive phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:477-88. |
| 23. | Sachdeva G, Gainder S, Suri V, Sachdeva N, Chopra S. Comparison of the different PCOS phenotypes based on clinical metabolic, and hormonal profile, and their response to clomiphene. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2019;23:326-31. |
| 24. | Zhang HY, Zhu FF, Xiong J, Shi XB, Fu SX. Characteristics of different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on the Rotterdam criteria in a large-scale Chinese population. BJOG 2009;116:1633-9. |
| 25. | Moran C, Tena G, Moran S, Ruiz P, Reyna R, Duque X. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome and related disorders in mexican women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2010;69:274-80. |
| 26. | Tehrani FR, Rashidi H, Khomami MB, Tohidi M, Azizi F. The prevalence of metabolic disorders in various phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome: A community based study in Southwest of Iran. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:89. |
| 27. | Badawy A, Elnashar A, Totongy M. RETRACTED: Clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitors for superovulation in women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination: A prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1355-9. |
| 28. | Bayar U, Basaran M, Kiran S, Coskun A, Gezer S. Use of an aromatase inhibitor in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: A prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1447-51. |
| 29. | Roy KK, Baruah J, Singla S, Sharma JB, Singh N, Jain SK, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of Letrozole and Clomiphene citrate in induction of ovulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci 2012;5:20-5. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 30. | Kar S. Current evidence supporting “letrozole” for ovulation induction (2003). J Hum Reprod Sci 2013;6:93-8. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 31. | Mitwally MF, Casper RF. Aromatase inhibitors in ovulation induction. Semin Reprod Med 2004;22:61-78. |
| 32. | Casper RF, Mitwally MF. A historical perspective of aromatase inhibitors for ovulation induction. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1352-5. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
|
