Users online: 586
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Table of Contents
November 2021
Volume 14 | Issue 5 (Supplement)
Page Nos. 1-68
Online since Tuesday, November 16, 2021
Accessed 8,800 times.
PDF access policy
Journal allows immediate open access to content in HTML + PDF
EPub access policy
Full text in EPub is free except for the current issue. Access to the latest issue is reserved only for the paid subscribers.
View issue as eBook
Issue statistics
RSS
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
EDITORIAL
From the editor's desk
p. 1
Padma Rekha Jirge
DOI
:10.4103/0974-1208.330502
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
RECOMMENDATIONS
ISAR consensus guidelines on add-ons treatment in
in vitro
fertilization
p. 3
Jaideep Malhotra, Keshav Malhotra, Sudesh Kamat, Akansha Mishra, Charulata Chatterjee, Seema Nair, Pranay Ghosh, Rajvi Mehta, Harsha Bhadraka, Sapna Srinivas, Lalith Kumar, Rushika Mistry, Deepak Goenka, Gaurav Kant
DOI
:10.4103/0974-1208.330501
Study Question:
What are the good practices for the use of ADD-ON Treatments in IVF cycles in INDIA?
What is Already Known:
Add on treatments in IVF are procedures and technologies which are offered to patients in hope of improving the success rates. A lot of add on treatments exist; most of them have limited evidence and data for the Indian patient population is miniscule. These interventions may have limited effects, so it is imperative that any new technology that is offered is evaluated properly and has enough evidence to suggest that it is safe and effective.
Study Design, Size, Duration:
This is the report of a 2-day consensus meeting where two moderators were assigned to a group of experts to collate information on Add on treatments in IVF in INDIA. This meeting utilised surveys, available scientific evidence and personal laboratory experience into various presentations by experts on pre-decided specific topics.
Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods:
Expert professionals from ISAR representing clinical and embryology fields.
Main Results and the Role of Chance:
The report is divided in various components including the health of the Offspring, the various ADD ons available to an ART center, consensus points for each technology & qualifications and trainings for embryologists, the report and recommendations of the expert panel reflect the discussion on each of the topics and try to lay down good practice points for labs to follow.
Limitations, Reasons for Caution:
The recommendations are solely based on expert opinion. Future availability of data may warrant an update of the same.
Wider Implications of the Findings:
These guidelines can help labs across the country to standardise their ART services and improve clinical outcomes, it will also motivate clinics to collect data and report the use of Add ons to the national registry.
Study Funding/Competing Interest(S):
The consensus meeting and writing of the paper was supported by funds from CooperSurgical India.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Indian society for assisted reproduction consensus guidelines on preimplantation genetic testing in
in vitro
fertilization clinics
p. 31
Jaideep Malhotra, Keshav Malhotra, Gaurav Majumdar, Ritu Hari, Vijayakumar Chelur, Sayali Kandari, Dayanidhi Sharma, Nishad Chimote, Manjeet S Mehta, Sarabpreet Singh, Feseena Sethi, Vijay S Mangoli, Parasuram Gopinath, Krishna Chaitanya, Priya Selvaraj
DOI
:10.4103/0974-1208.330503
Study Question:
What are the good practice guidelines for Pre implantation genetic testing applicable in INDIA?
What is Already Known:
Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT) is not new in India. It is used to identify euploid embryos for transfer, thus enabling couples to achieve a healthy pregnancy. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding PGT in the international forums; most of these debates have failed to reach a consensus on whether PGT should be offered or its concerns be validated more.
Study Design, Size, Duration:
This is the report of a 2-day consensus meeting where two moderators were assigned to a group of experts to collate information on Pre implantation genetic testing and embryo biopsy practices in INDIA. This meeting utilised surveys, available scientific evidence and personal laboratory experience into various presentations by experts on pre-decided specific topics.
Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods:
Expert professionals from ISAR representing clinical, embryological and genetic fields.
Main Results and the Role of Chance:
The report is divided into various components defining the terminologies, the various requirements, qualifications, recommendations on PGT -A,M,SR, and quality management: the report and recommendations of the expert panel reflect the discussion on each of the topics and try to lay down good practice points for labs to follow.
Limitations, Reasons for Caution:
The recommendations are solely based on expert opinion. Future availability of data may warrant an update of the same.
Wider Implications of the Findings:
These guidelines can help labs across the country to standardise their PGT services and improve clinical outcomes.
Study Funding/Competing Interest(S):
The consensus meeting and writing of the paper was supported by funds from CooperSurgical India.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
ISAR consensus guidelines on safety and ethical practices in
in vitro
fertilization clinics
p. 48
Jaideep Malhotra, Keshav Malhotra, Pankaj Talwar, Priya Kannan, Prabhakar Singh, Yogesh Kumar, Nishad Chimote, Charudutt Joshi, Sachin Bawle, RB Agarwal, Saroj Agarwal, Ved Prakash, Pooja Awasthi, Sanjay Shukla, Ram Prakash, Satish Kumar Adiga
DOI
:10.4103/0974-1208.330504
Study Question:
What are the Safe and Ethical practices for ART applicable in INDIA?
What is Already Known:
The Indian IVF industry is booming; with mushrooming of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics in the country, the need for regulation is immense. The ISAR has taken up this initiative to lead the way forward in establishing practice guidelines for the safe and ethical use of ARTs in our country. These guidelines discuss the points to consider before the starting of an IVF unit, to the designing of the laboratory, the staffing pattern and experience recommendations, laboratory safety guidelines, documentation and patient traceability, gamete traceability, handling biological material, the consumables and media, and different consents and checklists and also propose key performance indicators for the Indian scenario.
Study Design, Size, Duration:
This is the report of a 2-day consensus meeting where two moderators were assigned to a group of experts to collate information on safe and ethical ivf practices in INDIA. This meeting utilised surveys, available scientific evidence and personal laboratory experience into various presentations by experts on pre-decided specific topics.
Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods:
Expert professionals from ISAR representing clinical and embryology fields.
Main Results and the Role of Chance:
The report is divided in various components including the regulations, the various requirements for an ART center, qualifications and trainings, recommendations on good practices and quality management: the report and recommendations of the expert panel reflect the discussion on each of the topics and try to lay down good practice points for labs to follow.
Limitations, Reasons for Caution:
The recommendations are solely based on expert opinion. Future availability of data may warrant an update of the same.
Wider Implications of the Findings:
These guidelines can help labs across the country to standardise their ART services and improve clinical outcomes.
Study Funding/Competing Interest(S):
The consensus meeting and writing of the paper was supported by funds from CooperSurgical India.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Acknowledgement
.
HTML Full Text not available
[PDF]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
About us
Editorial board
Instructions
Subscribe
Search articles
Contact us
Advertise With Us
My Preferences
Next Issue
Previous Issue
Sitemap
|
What's New
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© 2007 - Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 20
th
June, 2007